NYC's and the streetwear cultures by the bicycle messengers

 

Marching Toward the Stars: America, Military Leadership, and the Shadow of Heinleinism

By Hidayat Saad

---

There are times when fiction reflects reality so closely that it feels like prophecy. Robert A. Heinlein’s Starship Troopers is one of those texts, praised, misunderstood, and endlessly debated. At its heart lies a provocative idea: that those who serve the state through military or civil sacrifice should be the ones entrusted with its political power.

Call it Heinleinism: a system where citizenship is not a birthright, but something earned through service. In that world, duty forges legitimacy.

Robert Heinlein, which the term "Heinleinian/ism" is coined for this article. The political ideas explored by Heinlein in his well-known hard sci-fi novel, Starship Troopers,deals with the world of structured social position that wages around the citizenship, political consolidation and governance of mankind are being exclusively amended by military veterans and generals, as the focus of its narrative.

Now look back at America.

From its founding to its rise as a 20th-century superpower, the United States has often turned to military men in moments of transformation. George Washington, the reluctant warrior-statesman, carved the template. Ulysses S. Grant brought the scars of civil war into the Oval Office. Dwight D. Eisenhower, supreme commander of Allied forces, presided over the Cold War dawn with a calm that only battlefield veterans seem to possess.

It is no coincidence that some of the most stabilizing leaders in America’s most turbulent moments have come wearing uniforms. Nor is it a stretch to say their foreign policies, shaped in war rooms and along front lines, helped forge the muscular scaffolding of American exceptionalism.

But does this pattern suggest that the United States is, at its core, a Heinleinian nation? That its political soul is less Jeffersonian and more of those toward Spartan?

But, there is some caveats to that. The United States was born out of revolution, yes, but one fought in the name of civic republicanism, not military absolutism. The framers were deeply wary of standing armies. Civilian control of the military is not just tradition; it is a constitutional mandate. Such objectives was practically an opposing wishes of the Heileinian's world, if any.

Yet in practice, service, especially military service, has often functioned as a kind of invisible credential in American political life. A stamp of legitimacy. A story voters trust. It explains why Eisenhower was swept into office with near-mythic confidence, why veterans like John McCain commanded national respect, why the image of a soldier-politician still captures the American imagination.

Dwight D. Eisenhower, the former Supreme Commander of Allied Forces that led the Washington's agenda to the world post-WW2 internationalist toward the policy of communist containment in favor of America's international liberalism-based world order. He is the first President to led the post-WW2 world in the opening chapters of "Cold War", which he oversaw the first Korean War, implementing a nuclear deterrence policy on many of the major escalation of military conflict between the America's and the opposing Soviet's blocs that happened during his tenure.

There’s something deeply Heinleinian in that: the quiet suggestion that only those who’ve risked for the republic truly understand how to preserve it.

Still, the resemblance is more cultural than structural. Heinlein’s vision is exacting: no vote without service. America has never imposed such a rule. Its streets are filled with first-generation voters and born-citizens alike. Its leadership, especially in the last fifty years, has swung back toward career politicians, technocrats, and activists.

And yet, the shadow of Heinleinism lingers.

You see it in the reverence for veterans at campaign rallies. In the way national service is proposed, time and again, as the cure to civic apathy. In the belief, subtle but persistent, that those who’ve worn the uniform somehow see the world more clearly.

George C. Marshall,  Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, and American statesman responsible in rebuilding the European community toward reconstruction after WW2, and strengthening the Washington commitment toward the Atlanticism causes as a long-standing foreign policy objective of Washington. While he was not a President, his military careers on so many war efforts and leaderships established him as an enduring legacy of military leadership figures in both America and European community through the European reconstruction policy that bearing his name, the "Marshall Plan".

What Heinlein gave us was not a political prescription, but a moral provocation: Who deserves to decide? In that question, America hears an echo of its own internal struggle: between the ideal of equal voice and the admiration of earned authority.

So no, the United States is not a Heinleinian nation in law, or design that convey the such title. But in myth? In temperament? In the stories it tells itself about duty, sacrifice, and leadership?

It marches closer than it likes to admit.


Tags: Heinlein, Military History, American Exceptionalism, Starship Troopers, Civil-Military Relations, Political Philosophy, Atlanticism, Leadership, Militarism, Marshall Plan, Authority, America, United States, Supreme Leader, President